Sarcouncil Journal of Medical Series

Abstract: This study focused on understanding the relationship between anesthesia and obstetric emergencies through a prospective observational study. The study was conducted in a tertiary care general hospital with a specialized obstetrics unit. The adult population included pregnant patients aged 18 years and older who were reported to require anesthesia intervention due to obstetric emergencies. Patients with a history of contraindications to regional anesthesia, those under 18 years of age, or those who underwent a planned cesarean section without complications were excluded. Data were collected for a cohort of 130 patients from Iraq at several different hospitals, including demographics, type of emergency, anesthesia techniques used, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and protocol adherence rates. The study lasted for 13 months, and statistical analysis was performed using appropriate software. The aim of the study was to extract relevant information on anesthesia practice during obstetric emergencies. The participants in this study comprised 130 mostly primiparous women, with an age mean of 30.5 years and a BMI of 28.2 kg/m². Their variables on socioeconomic status, levels of education, and mode of vaginal delivery, whereas protocol adherence of the anesthetist was found to be varying, with several gaps in pre-anesthesia screening. Almost 100% in focused history in physical examination. Clinical practice mainly relied on regional anesthesia, with most patients suffering from no complications. Maternal outcomes were favorable, with 92.3% of the patients being able to deliver successfully, and no maternal mortality occurred. The neonatal outcomes involved preterm birth, low birth weight, and small-for-gestational-age infants. Implementation varied between initiatives for education and preparedness. Of the 30 participating institutions, 93.3% (28/30) had regular obstetric emergency training, and 83.3% (25/30) participated in simulation exercises. Only 50% (15/30), however, engaged in anesthesia outcomes research, and half of the institutions did not have with rapid response protocols, having only been implemented in 83.3% (25/30) of institutions, while 100% (30/30) continuously monitored labor, and regular updating of their protocols was carried out in 73.3% (22/30). Among the many suggestions in the publication is the need for standardized checklists, prenatal anesthesia consultations, and the implementation of crisis resource management principles in order to enhance preparedness. Based on the best evidence in obstetric anesthesia and practical recommendations, this review can offer anesthesiologists evidence-based recommendations in response to complex emergencies to reduce complications and enhance safety in various care environments